Empire of the petal throne word of tekumel

#Empire of the petal throne word of tekumel full#
#Empire of the petal throne word of tekumel free#

And on top of that, itвЂ™s absolutely free and comes with a whole bunch of scenarios, campaigns and source material. And it is dedicated, as so much of my work is, to the genius, generosity and humanity of Professor M.A.R. Who needs yet another? But many people tell me that TirikГ©lu is their preferred choice, and you know what? ItвЂ™s mine too. I know, I know it seems like thereвЂ™s a new TГ©kumel RPG every couple of years. Well, here it is вЂ“ as complete a version of TirikГ©lu as youвЂ™re ever likely to see. It flows faster that way and, with imaginative players, fights feel agreeably cinematic.

#Empire of the petal throne word of tekumel full#

вЂњHeвЂ™s going for a full attack.вЂќ вЂњIвЂ™m going for a full parry.вЂќ Once you resolve that, youвЂ™re free to put any narrative interpretation you like on the result. ( GURPS, IвЂ™m looking at you.) TirikГ©lu works best if you keep it abstract till after you roll the dice. Nowadays there are quite a few role-playing games where you make a detailed decision about what youвЂ™re trying to do, then wade through pages of rules to find your chance of doing it. ItвЂ™s all handled at the point the wound is taken.

So taking damage above a certain percentage of your hits can reduce your skill, and may require a check to stay conscious, but you donвЂ™t need to keep a tally of how much damage each wound caused. It seemed almost too simple on paper, but in practice we found it allowed for rich tactical choices.ДЄlso I wanted to avoid hit location and lots of book-keeping, but not simply to revert to the amorphous pudding of hit points of D&D.

In TirikГ©lu that became the principle of full- and half-actions. His contention was that a moderately skilled fighter could, by concentrating on defence, hold off a more skilled opponent who was dividing his attention between attack and defence. First, in a treatise by a duellist from the 17th century (quite possibly Sir William Hope) I came across the concept of вЂњsafe fightingвЂќ. Make combat quick to use but more than just the endless dice-rolling of, say, RuneQuest. Recapture the evocative magic of those early adventures by cross-pollinating EPT spells with ideas from The Book of Ebon Bindings. Simplify the system so that the rules didnвЂ™t keep tripping up the play. This was the early 1990s, so it seems a little early to talk of an Old School Revival (not a term I like anyway) but the aim was there. вЂњHBS FactorsвЂќ and вЂњHealing G9sвЂќ gave the game a tabletop miniatures flavour rather too far from the freewheeling shared stories we were looking for.ДЄnd so I returned to my own rules and began to refine them into the game I had hoped Swords & Glory would be. The other book, the rules, appealed less. My group switched for a while, but it was the S&G Sourcebook that was getting dog-eared from use. I began constructing my own set of TГ©kumel rules from the fragmentary description in the ProfessorвЂ™s letters, like reconstructing an unknown animal from just a few bones.ДЇinally вЂњthe new EPTвЂќ appeared. вЂњWe now have one roll to hit, one to get past the shield, one for damage (minus armour) and if one rolls 0 on a 10-sided die on this last roll, then a critical hit for more damage.вЂќ We were hungry for a more authentic experience of TГ©kumel, so we would pass around the ProfessorвЂ™s letters (he was always incredibly generous with his time) and pick endlessly over comments like this: This was the era of RuneQuest and The Fantasy Trip. The original EPT had served its purpose for a while, but my group were moving beyond those D&D-inspired mechanics. Barker in the late 1970s and early вЂ80s, I was treated to tantalizing glimpses of вЂњthe new Empire of the Petal ThroneвЂќ he was writing.